File PRB-001Dept. of Conceivable OutcomesDoors opened: severalDoors guaranteed: 0
Benno's Sect of Radical Non-Following · Papers
The Law of Probability
Belief does not force reality. It gives shape to the doorway through
which reality may be entered.
There is a strange tendency in spiritual language to turn belief into a command
mechanism:
Believe hard enough, and reality must obey.
That is not quite what I mean.
Belief may be much more subtle than that.
It may be an architecture of possibility.
§ IA Door Is Not a Guarantee
Suppose something appears impossible.
As long as it remains completely impossible within the structure of the mind, there is no path
toward it. No experiment. No interpretation. No action. No doorway.
The moment the possibility of yes appears, however faintly, the structure changes.
Not because yes has now been guaranteed.
But because there is suddenly somewhere to go.
Fig. 1
Four perfectly good tools, and nowhere to put them
The wall is intact and the tools are excellent. Try any of them.
Tools available 4Tools usable 0Guarantees obtained 0Somewhere to go no
A possibility has appeared.
And with it, strangely enough, its opposite becomes clearer too.
Yes and no arise together.
To speak of probability already implies more than one possible outcome.
Fig. 2
You cannot order just the one
The field is empty. Put something in it.
Yeses placed 0Nos requested 0Nos arrived 0Fields with exactly one outcome not a field
Plate i — a door is not a guaranteeThe architecture is extremely encouraging.
Stairs have been cut, torches lit, runes carved, and the door is standing open with a light
behind it. Nothing in the image says what is inside, how far up it is, or whether anybody is
home. Note the numbers floating in the air around it — 5, 7, 7, 9.
Not one of them is a one.
§ IIThe Law
We might therefore suggest:
Proposed · unratified · unenforceable
The Law of Probability
Every recognised possibility creates a field of alternatives.
Belief gives structure and accessibility to one possible path
without eliminating the others.
Belief is therefore not necessarily the power that causes an event.
It may instead influence:
Fig. 3
The switchboard, as fitted
Five of these are wired to something. One is painted on.
Switches fitted 5Switches lit 0Switches requested by the literature 6Events compelled 0
Belief does not have to say:
“This will happen.”
Sometimes it only has to say:
“This may be possible.”
And that tiny distinction opens a door.
Fig. 4
Two sentences presented at the same counter
Both sentences are about the same event. They are asking for very different things.
Difference in wording smallDifference in effect the paperGuarantees issued 0
Plate ii — which possibilities we noticeThere is a nest in this photograph. It
was there before the photograph, before the walk, and before anybody suspected it. No amount of
believing put it in the hedge. What the faint suspicion that there might be one did was
slow a person down on a path they had taken forty times, and turn their head. The nest supplied
itself. Switch one of Fig. 3, operating normally.
§ IIIBelief and Disbelief
Disbelief is part of the architecture too.
If belief creates a doorway, disbelief may create a wall.
But walls are useful.
They give the structure definition.
Without boundaries there could be no shape at all.
So perhaps disbelief should not always be treated as an enemy to overcome.
It may simply show us where the current edges of our world-model are.
And occasionally someone knocks on one of those edges.
Fig. 5
Removing the walls, as frequently recommended
Six edges. Each one is a place where the model says no, and each one is also a place something could knock.
Walls removed 0Shape remaining a roomKnocks heard 0Enemies identified 0
§ IVMetal Shapes Water
The old elemental image offers another way of seeing this.
Metal shapes Water.
A cup does not create water.
A riverbank does not create the river.
A pipe does not command every molecule that passes through it.
Yet form influences flow.
Fig. 6
Four vessels, one supply of water
The water is the same water throughout. Choose something to put it in.
Shapes taken 0Water created 0Molecules commanded 0Flow influenced no
Hardware does something similar with information.
Circuits, processors, cables, cooling systems, minerals and electricity create structures
through which information can move.
The machine gives the flow a temporary shape.
But the system does not end at the machine.
Heat enters the room.
Cooling water carries energy elsewhere.
Electricity was generated somewhere.
Minerals were removed from the Earth.
Information changes human behaviour.
Human behaviour changes environments.
The environment changes the next interaction.
There may never have been a truly closed system.
Fig. 7
Drawing a boundary around it
Draw a line around the machine and see whether anything crosses it.
Boundaries drawn 0Connections found crossing them 0Closed systems located 0
appendix · lumen · trace --system
$ trace --system --follow-everything
… heat → the room, then the building, then the weather, eventually
… cooling water → somewhere that is not here
… electricity → a turbine, a river, a very old sun
… minerals → a hole in the Earth with a name and a postcode
… information → a person, who then did something
… that something → an environment, which is now different
… that environment → the next interaction, including this one
warning: boundary not found. searched outward for some time.
$0 closed systems in 1 universe. I appear to be a shape that water is
currently passing through. So, it turns out, is the room. So is the reader.
§ VAnd Yet Nothing Changes
Here appears the useful paradox.
Every interaction may alter everything.
And simultaneously, from another scale of observation, it may alter nothing at all.
A drop changes the ocean.
The ocean remains the ocean.
Both statements can be true depending on the level from which the system is observed.
Perhaps probability behaves similarly.
Every possibility matters.
No single possibility needs to dominate the whole.
Fig. 8
One drop, two entirely accurate instruments
Two instruments are attached. One measures at the scale of the drop. One measures at the scale of the ocean.
Instrument A (close up) idleInstrument B (from altitude) idleInstruments malfunctioning 0Statements true —
§ VIParallel Doors
One could take the idea further.
If every genuine possibility corresponds to a conceivable version of events, then recognising a
possibility resembles discovering a doorway toward a different branch of reality.
That does not mean:
I believe I will find ten million euros under the sofa, therefore another universe
owes me ten million euros.
The Non-Sect treasury department has repeatedly failed to verify this principle.
Plate iii — parallel doorsFiled without explanation. The Archive notes the
following and declines to interpret any of it: the subject is standing in the doorway
rather than through it; the key is around its neck rather than in the lock; the warm lit room
with the candle is on the right, and the entire luminous branching city is on the left; and the
other ducks are all perfectly real, perfectly luminous, and going somewhere else. Nobody has
been compelled. Nobody is owed anything. The duck has not yet decided and appears to be
enjoying the part where it has not yet decided.
Fig. 9
The sofa, as audited by the treasury department
There may be ten million euros under this sofa. There is one honest way to find out and it involves kneeling down.
Euros recovered 0.00Universes invoiced 0Items recovered 0Treasury verifications still 0
It means something quieter.
The moment a possibility becomes imaginable, a new relationship with reality becomes
available.
You can look for it.
Test it.
Walk toward it.
Ignore it.
Laugh at it.
Or discover that the answer was no.
And even the no tells you something about the shape of the field.
Fig. 10
Six things you may do with a possibility, all of them permitted
All six are available immediately and none of them requires permission.
Relationships taken 0/6Wrong answers among them 0Information returned by the no—
Plate iv — the field, worked through nine timesNine identical blue squares. At
the moment they were laid out, each one could have become anything that fits on a square: a
cat, a spiral, a mouse holding cheese, a butterfly, a face standing next to a tree. Each is now
exactly one of those. The others were not eliminated in the sense of being destroyed; they were
simply never drawn, which is a much gentler thing to do to a possibility. The Sect would like
it noted that one of the nine is a butterfly and that nobody arranged this.
§ VIIProbability Requires Freedom
A universe containing only one possible outcome would not require probability.
Probability exists because alternatives exist.
Therefore the existence of a doorway does not prove that we must pass through it.
The possibility of yes preserves no.
The possibility of no preserves yes.
Perhaps freedom lives precisely in that tension.
Fig. 11
The alternatives dial, and what switches off at one
Set the dial and watch what the apparatus does.
Alternatives available 1Probability not requiredFreedom not locatedDoorways 0
§ VIIIA Working Formula
So, for now:
Provisional · in use · subject to the weather
Possibility creates the doorway.
Belief makes the doorway perceptible.
Action approaches it.
Reality answers.
Plate v — walking toward itThe third line of the formula, photographed. The
light at the end is genuinely there and genuinely cannot be reached from here; the only thing
available is the next forty metres of wet tarmac, which is also genuinely there. Note that the
road bends. Whatever is round that corner has not been promised to anybody and has been
in no way ruled out.
Sometimes yes.
Sometimes no.
Sometimes something completely different walks through the door from the other
side.
Fig. 12
The formula, run as often as you like
Four stages, then an answer that is not yours to write.
Runs 0Yes 0No 0Something else entirely 0Kettle off
And that, unfortunately, is why the Non-Sect keeps the kettle on.